WebMar 8, 2016 · However this decision would appear to be at odds with other recent vicarious liability decisions by the Court of Appeal in Graham v Commercial Bodyworks [2015] EWCA Civ 47 and the decision of the Inner House in Vaickuviene v … WebFeb 5, 2015 · Paul Graham Appellant and Commercial Bodyworks Limited Respondent Mr Timothy Meakin (instructed by Scrivenger Seabrook Ltd) for the Appellant Mr Jonathan Mitchell & Ms Sarah Hopkinson (instructed by Keoghs LLP) for the Respondent Hearing dates: 14 th January 2015 Lord Justice Longmore Introduction 1

Vicarious liability: employer not liable for injuries sustained in ...

WebGraham v Commercial Bodyworks. The Court of Appeal decides if there was vicarious liability following the intentional act of a co-employee. The Insurance Act 2015 received Royal Assent on 12th February 2015 and so will come into force in August 2016. Below are links to our three updates on the Act. WebJudgment: February 5, 2015 An employer was not vicariously liable for the severe injuries caused by an employee who, while at work and apparently as a prank, had put highly … dark area on top of foot

Graham v Commercial Bodyworks Ltd: CA 5 Feb 2015

WebFeb 5, 2015 · Graham and Commercial Bodyworks Employer not liable for staff member's dangerous prank An employer was not vicariously liable for the severe injuries caused by … WebJun 26, 2024 · It is a matter of regret that in neither of the Morrisons appeals did the Supreme Court considered whether the Court of Appeal judgment in Graham v Commercial Bodyworks Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 47 was correct. Mr Graham was badly burned when a colleague, who had been one of his best friends and who had obtained … WebMar 17, 2015 · Graham v Commercial Bodyworks Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 47 CA vicarious liability course of employment horseplay The Court of Appeal has held that creating … dark armpits due to pregnancy